https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue May 2 12:49:55 2017
New Revision: 247497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 78687] Set SRA grp_write lazily
2017-05-02 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 40979
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40979&action=edit
Possible fix
This patch addresses the issue and passes bootstrap and testing on
x86_64-linux. It is definitely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> From looking at the testcase, I think it is s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>From looking at the testcase, I think it is solely SRA that can help here, if
it manages to scalarize everything, we are good, if not, you get terrible code.
The classes are huge and largely uninitialized, a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|