https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, I think this duplicates to PR77988 and was fixed by richi. I will add a
test case for this though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As suspected. VRP missed folding statement after copy propagation. Testing
patch...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The vectorized code looks good to me. It is in VRP2 that GCC generates below
expression:
MEM[&MEM[(void *)&b + 49B] + 0B];
(gdb) call debug_tree(*tp)
unit size
align 8 symtab 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
