https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Now that we have another (early) pass things should be even worse. Current
trunk at -O2 with -fno-checking improved though (I guess by means of a cost
model or so):
phase opt and generate : 69.39 (99%)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Btw, is the compile-time spent in the threading or in followup passes that
> blow up with the large number of BBs?
>
I was quite surprised because the original
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I've noted that we have suspiciously many 'thread' passes but of couse the
transform itself looks not appropriately limited.
Btw, is the compile-time spent in the threading or in followup passes that
blow u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Target Milestone|---
