https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71990
Ivan Sorokin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71990
--- Comment #4 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com ---
OK, so it would have to be a special kind of cloning, not the one you can do
yourself from code as of today?
As a user, I suppose there's no really good way of dealing with this currently,
rig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71990
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to sgunderson from comment #2)
> Would pushing the mv automatically upwards into callers really help? There's
> still no way that I can see to inline the function; I mean, pushing upwards
> is what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71990
--- Comment #2 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com ---
Would pushing the mv automatically upwards into callers really help? There's
still no way that I can see to inline the function; I mean, pushing upwards is
what I've been trying to do here manu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
