[Bug tree-optimization/70291] muldc3 code generation could be smarter

2018-05-09 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291 --- Comment #6 from Wilco --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #4) > Implemented for GCC 9. Since multiple people seem interested in the improvement, would it be useful to backport?

[Bug tree-optimization/70291] muldc3 code generation could be smarter

2018-05-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||smcallis at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/70291] muldc3 code generation could be smarter

2018-05-03 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work

[Bug tree-optimization/70291] muldc3 code generation could be smarter

2018-05-03 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu May 3 12:59:43 2018 New Revision: 259889 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259889&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [tree-complex.c] PR tree-optimization/70291: Inline floati

[Bug tree-optimization/70291] muldc3 code generation could be smarter

2018-03-15 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Wil

[Bug tree-optimization/70291] muldc3 code generation could be smarter

2016-07-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/70291] muldc3 code generation could be smarter

2016-03-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|