https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70046
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I've confirmed the regression to be caused by r230647
Estimated Estimated
Base Base BasePeak Peak Peak
Ben
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70046
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I checked "-Ofast -march=native/-march=haswell" for GCC@230647 on Xeon, there
is no regression. I also checked "-Ofast -mtune=core-avx2" for GCC@230689,
there is no regression either.
I looked into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70046
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like at the time of that change. I will have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Target Milestone|---
