https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70032
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Yes, tail-merging needs to utilize a "value-numbering" like IPA ICF (in fact,
just re-use its implementation - I think this is what Martins patch set does).
My cleanup comment was supposed to be the first c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70032
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70032
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Note the very first "cleanup" would be to rip out all value numbering use
> from
> the current implementation and make the pass properly separate. Now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
