https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68786
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 9 13:42:06 2015
New Revision: 231454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68786
* tree-if-conv.c: Include built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68786
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68786
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> For normal vectorized stores, the alignment i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68786
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For normal vectorized stores, the alignment is preserved through the
MEM_REF/TARGET_MEM_REF type, e.g.
5991 TREE_TYPE (data_ref)
5992= build_aligned_type (TREE_TYP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68786
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Looks like an old bug. We may see the same problem on avx2 using older
compiler. Here is a test for GCC5:
double *a;
long long c;
int *d;
void
test (void)
{
int b;
for (b = 0; b < 1024; b++)
{