https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I get some (unrelated) ICE in my heavily patched dev tree with that patch so
> cannot verify it does anything good.
Ah, it's the patch itself not working (domw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I get some (unrelated) ICE in my heavily patched dev tree with that patch so
cannot verify it does anything good.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 36832
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36832&action=edit
unrelated(?) patch
Yeah, note that tree-complex.c is structured in a way that exposes SSA name
uses without ac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
