https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'd think using a volatile var in the optimization test is highly undesirable,
that can mean stopping optimizations differently between different compilers.
But, the same thing can be reproduced with:
void
fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
1<
