https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Sep 6 05:20:25 2017
New Revision: 251751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64910
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (reassociat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Sep 4 14:00:29 2017
New Revision: 251659
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251659&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-03 Jeff Law
PR tree-optimization/64910
* tree-s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Dec 21 04:49:02 2015
New Revision: 231871
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231871&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64910
* config/i386/i386.md (testqi_ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Here's the hack that I was playing with which shows the better code sequence:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
index 995..4515a4d 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
+++ b/gcc
