https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
>> I think that's easiest for Eric to say.
>
> Not really, I guess you want to debug the function and replay the computation
> since the cost is s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>> The new gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c test FAILs on 64-bit SPARC (only;
>> 32-bit is
>> o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #4 from bin.cheng ---
Hi Rainer,
This is caused by abnormal huge cost of function call `shiftadd_cost (true,
DImode, 2)'. It returns 100+ cost, resulting in huge cost when representing
use 1 with cand 4:
use 1
compare
in stateme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33429
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33429&action=edit
bb-slp-26.c.120t.slp1 dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33428
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33428&action=edit
slp dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33427
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33427&action=edit
ivopts dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
10 matches
Mail list logo
