https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 21 08:08:40 2017
New Revision: 245620
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245620&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61441
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #12)
> I encountered the same issue (undefined reference to `issignaling') on
> arm-none-eabi which is due to newlib's math.h not providing the issignaling
> macro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab ---
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr61441.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151223/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr61441.c:12:7: warning:
implicit declaration of function 'issignaling'
[-Wimplicit-function-d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #10 from Sujoy ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #9)
> There is no need to wait for bugs to move state (rather, if working on a
> bug, you may wish to change it to ASSIGNED yourself with yourself as
> assignee).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, ssaraswati at gmail dot com wrote:
> Ok, have a further question though. For the current test case, which has the
> following code -
>
> float sNaN = __builtin_nansf ("
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #8 from Sujoy ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #7)
> With -fno-signaling-nans, signaling NaN representations are trap
> representations - the compiler can assume that nothing ever manipulated as
> a floating-po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, ssaraswati at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from Sujoy ---
> (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5)
>
> > With -fno-signaling-nans we don't real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #6 from Sujoy ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5)
> With -fno-signaling-nans we don't really care about the result value.
I am not sure about this. -fno-signaling-nans is default and the original issue
mentions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, ssaraswati at gmail dot com wrote:
> With -fno-signaling-nans (which is the default), we need to fix the ccp so
> that
> the sNaN is converted to qNaN when the value is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #4 from Sujoy ---
Yes, I agree to your comment.
With -fno-signaling-nans (which is the default), we need to fix the ccp so that
the sNaN is converted to qNaN when the value is propagated.
With -fsignaling-nans, we need to ensure tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Bugs in -fsignaling-nans (in this case, that a conversion of a signaling
NaN from float to double is incorrectly folded) should be fixed just like
any other bug. That sentence is simply wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
Sujoy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssaraswati at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
15 matches
Mail list logo
