https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
There is a GSoC 2015 project which will try to address the AMS problem.
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2015/erikvarga/5693417237512192
It will be initially for SH. If it works ou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This just sounds like IV-opts going wrong.
