[Bug tree-optimization/60669] VRP misses asserts for some already defined statements

2021-11-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60669 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/60669] VRP misses asserts for some already defined statements

2021-07-12 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60669 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/60669] VRP misses asserts for some already defined statements

2020-02-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60669 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I ran into this same issue when I am writing a patch for PR55177 (attached below) but with f8 rather than f7 from vrp65.c. diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd index 363006e28fd..a31fe598a25 100644 --- a

[Bug tree-optimization/60669] VRP misses asserts for some already defined statements

2015-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60669 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/60669] VRP misses asserts for some already defined statements

2014-03-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60669 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- because it's not used in the paths dominated by the conditional.