[Bug tree-optimization/57417] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] hang on volatile int array

2013-05-27 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 27 May 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417 > > --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > > It seems to me that there is no good rea

[Bug tree-optimization/57417] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] hang on volatile int array

2013-05-27 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > It seems to me that there is no good reason to ever treat addresses of > TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS trees as different if there is not TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS > on offset determining pieces (though that would rely on gimpl

[Bug tree-optimization/57417] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] hang on volatile int array

2013-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 30202 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30202&action=edit prototype patch Like the attached.

[Bug tree-optimization/57417] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] hang on volatile int array

2013-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/57417] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] hang on volatile int array

2013-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|