http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 27 May 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417
>
> --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
> > It seems to me that there is no good rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
> It seems to me that there is no good reason to ever treat addresses of
> TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS trees as different if there is not TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS
> on offset determining pieces (though that would rely on gimpl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 30202
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30202&action=edit
prototype patch
Like the attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|