http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
> I've confirmed this is the case by putting a call to
> cgraph_rebuild_references into convert_callers_for_node and it "fixes"
> the issue. But of course that could be quite expensive.
Hmm, it is bit ugly to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
void baz (void);
int func ();
static void
bar (int a, int foo (void))
{
baz ();
foo ();
}
void
baz (void)
{
bar (0, func);
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|