https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
Bug 55177 depends on bug 103228, which changed state.
Bug 103228 Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] missed optimization with |^ at the
gimple level
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103228
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32221357007666124409ec3ee0d3a1cf263ebc9e
commit r12-5358-g32221357007666124409ec3ee0d3a1cf263ebc9e
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #20)
> So the original testcase shows there are missing other bitop related
> optimizations on the tree level and conversions.
> I have two patches which fix the origi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
Bug 55177 depends on bug 60669, which changed state.
Bug 60669 Summary: VRP misses asserts for some already defined statements
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60669
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #20)
> diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
I ran into a testcase regression with my new correct version. See PR 60669 for
that case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
So the original testcase shows there are missing other bitop related
optimizations on the tree level and conversions.
I have two patches which fix the original issue.
The first patch also fixes:
unsigned foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||TREE
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to David Woodhouse from comment #17)
> unsigned or(struct pkt *p)
gcc 5.0 optimizes the above case ...
> unsigned add(struct pkt *p)
... but not this one. Probably just the case of missing match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #17 from David Woodhouse ---
Er, yes. Sorry, I originally tried it with uint16_t but it wasn't even using
movbe for the pointer_abuse() function then, so I made it 32-bit instead.
Badly. Come to think of it, the lack of movbe in the 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to David Woodhouse from comment #15)
> {
> return (p->data[0] << 24) | (p->data[1] << 16) | (p->data[2] << 8) |
> p->data[1];
> }
p->data[3] ?
> unsigned add(struct pkt *p)
> {
> retur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #15 from David Woodhouse ---
More missed optimistions (gcc version 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1) (GCC))
I see it using movbe for the pointer_abuse() function, but can't see a simple
way to make it use movbe *without* killing kitte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
The original testcase in comment #0 is still not optimized at the gimple level
due to extra casts. If I use unsigned instead of int, the testcase is
optimized at the gimple level.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Assign
16 matches
Mail list logo
