[Bug tree-optimization/55162] Loop ivopts cuts off top bits of loop counter

2012-11-03 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55162 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-03 12:19:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I've created a new PR 55190 for this.

[Bug tree-optimization/55162] Loop ivopts cuts off top bits of loop counter

2012-11-02 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55162 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/55162] Loop ivopts cuts off top bits of loop counter

2012-11-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55162 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/55162] Loop ivopts cuts off top bits of loop counter

2012-11-01 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55162 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-01 10:11:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > The same could be done on SH, too (comparing against the end address instead > of > using a loop counter), but it would add a loop setup overhead. In th