[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener 2012-10-26 10:12:41 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Oct 26 10:12:35 2012 New Revision: 192841 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192841 Log: 2012-10-26 Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener 2012-10-24 13:14:21 UTC --- For example Index: cfgexpand.c === --- cfgexpand.c (revision 192760) +++ cfgexpand.c (working copy) @@ -447

[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-16 14:21:29 UTC --- > I'll try to plug the hole somewhere. Honza, any good idea? Hmm, adding __bulitin_noreturn call when this happens? Sounds sloppy, too. We should ask user to fix the source, too

[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek 2012-10-11 15:40:40 UTC --- Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=185913

[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2012-10-11 15:37:41 UTC --- In the second TC the user shouldn't lie to the compiler and put __attribute__((noreturn)) to a function, that in fact returns. Without this attribute, or with e.g. abort () in

[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-10 06:13:05 UTC --- Created attachment 28409 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28409 Testcase #2 Another testcase. Compile with `-O2 -funswitch-loops' (or with `-O3'). GCC