https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Do you have a GCC10 implementation that could be submitted in stage1, or has
> this been reviewed already earlier?
I should have one in a few weeks, but this indeed was reviewed and rejected
earlier. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42158|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34016|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32249|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Results (ms) for SPARKSkein on x86-64 at -O3 -gnatn -gnatp:
Before:
DT_Min is 36
Minis15.21
Median is15.22
After:
DT_Min is 36
Minis14.56
Median is14.58
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28323|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Eric, to what extent would this patch suffice? It detects situations
> when an array is the only thing preventing a local scalar from being
> totally replaced disappearing and if it also complies with a num
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 31402
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31402&action=edit
Patch detaching arrays away from aggregates
Eric, to what extent would this patch suffice? It detects situations
