[Bug tree-optimization/54077] Bytemark FP EMULATION 44% slower than with clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077 --- Comment #6 from wbrana 2012-07-31 10:11:48 UTC --- clang FP EMULATION: 405.92 : 194.78 : 44.95 4.4.7 FP EMULATION: 337.44 : 161.92 : 37.36 4.5.4 FP EMULATION: 320.08 :

[Bug tree-optimization/54077] Bytemark FP EMULATION 44% slower than with clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t.artem at mailcity dot com --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/54077] Bytemark FP EMULATION 44% slower than with clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077 --- Comment #4 from wbrana 2012-07-24 09:43:38 UTC --- Created attachment 27866 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27866 DivideInternalFPF.gcc.txt

[Bug tree-optimization/54077] Bytemark FP EMULATION 44% slower than with clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077 --- Comment #3 from wbrana 2012-07-24 09:42:27 UTC --- Created attachment 27865 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27865 DivideInternalFPF.clang.txt

[Bug tree-optimization/54077] Bytemark FP EMULATION 44% slower than with clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077 --- Comment #2 from wbrana 2012-07-24 09:41:21 UTC --- Created attachment 27864 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27864 AddSubInternalFPF.gcc.txt

[Bug tree-optimization/54077] Bytemark FP EMULATION 44% slower than with clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077 --- Comment #1 from wbrana 2012-07-24 09:39:37 UTC --- Created attachment 27863 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27863 AddSubInternalFPF.clang.txt