http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-24
11:53:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 24 11:53:29 2012
New Revision: 187828
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187828
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53465
* tree-vrp.c (ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-24
11:51:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 24 11:51:09 2012
New Revision: 187827
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187827
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53465
* tree-vrp.c (ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-05-24 07:57:58 UTC ---
On Thu, 24 May 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-24
> 07:42:26 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-24
07:42:26 UTC ---
Dropping all might pessimize some code (of course, this is VR_UNDEFINED, so the
question is if we need to care that much about broken code), like:
int
foo (int x, int y)
{
int z;
i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-05-24 07:29:52 UTC ---
On Thu, 24 May 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
