[Bug tree-optimization/52589] VRP missed optimization

2012-06-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52589 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-29 13:17:49 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jun 29 13:17:44 2012 New Revision: 189073 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189073 Log: 2012-06-29 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/52589] VRP missed optimization

2012-06-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52589 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/52589] VRP missed optimization

2012-06-29 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52589 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/52589] VRP missed optimization

2012-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52589 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52589] VRP missed optimization

2012-03-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52589 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-14 17:24:30 UTC --- The problem is in extract_range_from_binary_expr_1, we have s_7 = ASSERT_EXPR ; D.1721_3 = s_7 + 2147483648; if (D.1721_3 <= 268435455) s_7 has range ~[2147483648, 2415919103] (