http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52395
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-27
10:25:49 UTC ---
If all was well ('base' is literally appearing in the IL before SRA / IPA-SRA)
we could do
Index: gcc/tree-sra.c
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52395
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-27
10:03:10 UTC ---
Nearly all callers are, of course, via get_ref_for_model... so the question
holds the same for its 'base' parameter.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52395
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52395
--- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-02-27
09:49:38 UTC ---
x86_64 indeed, sorry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52395
--- Comment #2 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-02-27
09:47:38 UTC ---
Right, more conservative :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52395
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIR
