[Bug tree-optimization/52286] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code bug

2012-02-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52286 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-20 12:19:54 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 20 12:19:47 2012 New Revision: 184391 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184391 Log: PR tree-optimization/52286 * fold-const.c (

[Bug tree-optimization/52286] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code bug

2012-02-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52286 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3

[Bug tree-optimization/52286] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code bug

2012-02-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52286 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-17 11:17:12 UTC --- Created attachment 26694 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26694 gcc47-pr52286.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/52286] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code bug

2012-02-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52286 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-17 10:31:14 UTC --- Yeah, the bug is in fold-const.c, working on a fix already.

[Bug tree-optimization/52286] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code bug

2012-02-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52286 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-17 04:52:36 UTC --- Note VRP has the same issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/52286] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code bug

2012-02-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52286 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-17 04:50:20 UTC --- double_int_negative_p is returning true because of that.

[Bug tree-optimization/52286] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code bug

2012-02-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52286 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Component|c