http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-08
00:16:28 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Jan 8 00:16:18 2012
New Revision: 182984
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182984
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51600
* ipa-inline-an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-04
14:57:34 UTC ---
Estimate_edge_devirt_benefit seems to not make much of sense in mixing the
effects of inlining into the local size. Unforutnately we don't really have
much infrastructure for similar cas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-04
14:18:26 UTC ---
OK, it is bug in estimate_edge_devirt_benefit that cause overall function size
to go bellow 0. I am looking into the fix.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
