[Bug tree-optimization/49695] conditional moves for stores

2023-05-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49695 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/49695] conditional moves for stores

2016-07-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49695 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/49695] conditional moves for stores

2011-07-10 Thread revital.eres at linaro dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49695 --- Comment #3 from revital.eres at linaro dot org 2011-07-10 13:41:07 UTC --- > > the memory location we write to. > hmmm... after reading Sebastian Pop's paper from the last summit ("Improving > GCC’s auto-vectorization with if-conversion and loo

[Bug tree-optimization/49695] conditional moves for stores

2011-07-10 Thread revital.eres at linaro dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49695 --- Comment #2 from revital.eres at linaro dot org 2011-07-10 12:50:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > for (i = 0; i < point1->len; i++) > { > if (point1->arr[i].val) > { > point1->arr[i].val ^= (unsigned long long) r

[Bug tree-optimization/49695] conditional moves for stores

2011-07-10 Thread revital.eres at linaro dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49695 --- Comment #1 from revital.eres at linaro dot org 2011-07-10 10:05:07 UTC --- Created attachment 24730 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24730 Testcase which contains the loop