[Bug tree-optimization/46939] http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 example 6

2010-12-17 Thread regehr at cs dot utah.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46939 --- Comment #8 from John Regehr 2010-12-17 17:11:05 UTC --- Here is the current performance that we measure, in cycles: gcc-head: 43 icc: 41 clang-head: 41 suncc: 42

[Bug tree-optimization/46939] http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 example 6

2010-12-16 Thread regehr at cs dot utah.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46939 --- Comment #7 from John Regehr 2010-12-16 15:10:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Fixed. Awesome. We will re-test this code.

[Bug tree-optimization/46939] http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 example 6

2010-12-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46939 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46939] http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 example 6

2010-12-15 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46939 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-16 01:40:29 UTC --- the idiv issue is fixed now. It would be nice to compare if the function now has same speed as the other compilers.

[Bug tree-optimization/46939] http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 example 6

2010-12-15 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46939 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-16 01:27:25 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Dec 16 01:27:23 2010 New Revision: 167893 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167893 Log: PR middle-end/46939 * predic.c (predict_pat