[Bug tree-optimization/46785] Doesn't vectorize reduction x += y*y

2010-12-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46785] Doesn't vectorize reduction x += y*y

2010-12-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-06 10:05:11 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Dec 6 10:05:07 2010 New Revision: 167486 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167486 Log: 2010-12-06 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/46785] Doesn't vectorize reduction x += y*y

2010-12-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46785] Doesn't vectorize reduction x += y*y

2010-12-05 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com --- Comment #2 from Ir

[Bug tree-optimization/46785] Doesn't vectorize reduction x += y*y

2010-12-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03 15:39:49 UTC --- Btw, I wonder why we bother to check the defs at all and not just do def1 && flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (def1)) we should be able to handle all vectorizable reduc