http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03
11:05:43 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 3 11:05:39 2010
New Revision: 166239
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166239
Log:
2010-11-03 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-02
16:08:19 UTC ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-29
13:03:07 UTC ---
Actually we rewrite it into SSA form where we have no way to convince the
operand scanner to preserve the volatileness. I guess whoever uses automatic
volatiles deserves to get sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---