[Bug tree-optimization/46217] [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed

2010-11-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46217] [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed

2010-11-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03 11:05:43 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 3 11:05:39 2010 New Revision: 166239 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166239 Log: 2010-11-03 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/46217] [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed

2010-11-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-02 16:08:19 UTC --- I have a patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/46217] [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed

2010-10-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-29 13:03:07 UTC --- Actually we rewrite it into SSA form where we have no way to convince the operand scanner to preserve the volatileness. I guess whoever uses automatic volatiles deserves to get sta

[Bug tree-optimization/46217] [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed

2010-10-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46217] [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed

2010-10-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---