[Bug tree-optimization/46186] Clang creates code running 1600 times faster than gcc's

2021-08-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/46186] Clang creates code running 1600 times faster than gcc's

2017-11-27 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186 AK changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hiraditya at msn dot com --- Comment #27 from AK -

[Bug tree-optimization/46186] Clang creates code running 1600 times faster than gcc's

2017-05-24 Thread drraph at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186 Raphael C changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drraph at gmail dot com --- Comment #26 from

[Bug tree-optimization/46186] Clang creates code running 1600 times faster than gcc's

2014-02-16 Thread jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186 Jackie Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/46186] Clang creates code running 1600 times faster than gcc's

2010-10-29 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186 --- Comment #24 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-29 21:58:46 UTC --- On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, sebpop at gmail dot com wrote: > here is a preliminary patch (not tested yet other that the PR testcase). How does this patch deal with needing

[Bug tree-optimization/46186] Clang creates code running 1600 times faster than gcc's

2010-10-29 Thread sebpop at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186 --- Comment #23 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2010-10-29 21:44:09 UTC --- Hi, here is a preliminary patch (not tested yet other that the PR testcase). This patch improves chrec_apply to also handle these very uncommon cases that some like to make