https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43174
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43174
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks the ADDR_EXPR issue is fixed by revision 185129.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43174
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note for the three levels of loop example, GCC chooses one IV for both j and k
loops, thus generates pretty clean output on x86_64 with O2.
For the simple example, now gcc can eliminate compariso
--- Comment #2 from rakdver at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2010-03-03
09:21 ---
Subject: Re: Teaching SCEV about ADDR_EXPR
causes regression
> This together with the patch mentioned in the previous comment allows to
> generate:
> ivtmp.0 = &a[0][0]
>
> L1:
> s.0 = PHI(0, s.2)
--- Comment #1 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 17:43
---
Created an attachment (id=20001)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20001&action=view)
Simplify increments in IVopts using final values of inner loop IVs
A quick & dirty attempt to implement regis
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
|
