--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 14:10 ---
Subject: Bug 42462
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 8 14:10:15 2010
New Revision: 156601
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156601
Log:
2010-02-08 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/42995
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 22:23 ---
Subject: Bug 42462
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jan 7 22:22:32 2010
New Revision: 155713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155713
Log:
Backport tests from mainline
2010-01-07 H.J. Lu
Backport
--- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 19:44 ---
Fixed.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 19:42 ---
Subject: Bug 42462
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Jan 5 19:42:32 2010
New Revision: 155658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155658
Log:
2010-01-05 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimization/424
--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 16:03 ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00215.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42462
--- Comment #4 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 13:39 ---
This weird side-effect of IPA-SRA is caused by a bug in
compute_inline_parameters which should pass node->decl instead of
current_function_decl to its helper functions. I am about to test the
following patch which f
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42462
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-31 15:57 ---
-O1 -fipa-sra shows the problem as well. We can see wrong (or rather missing)
cloning of static initializers:
;; Function void Foo< >::exec2() [with
= int] (_ZN3FooIiE5exec2Ev)
void Foo< >::exec2() [with =
int
