[Bug tree-optimization/41212] [4.5 Regression] miscompilation at -O2

2009-09-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 11:40 --- This looks like your restrict changes get in the way. We have y_13 = (real(kind=8) & restrict) &y; .. *y_13 = D.1416_35; ... D.1412_51 = y; so one access via the plain y gets re-introduced by forwprop someho

[Bug tree-optimization/41212] [4.5 Regression] miscompilation at -O2

2009-09-03 Thread jpr at csc dot fi
--- Comment #5 from jpr at csc dot fi 2009-09-03 10:40 --- Adding -fstrict-aliasing to -O1 breaks the code: gfortran -o m m.f90 -O1; ./m y= 0.60653065945526063 2*y= 1.2130613189105213 gfortran -o m m.f90 -O1 -fstrict-aliasing ; ./m y= 0.60653065945526063 2*y= 2.00

[Bug tree-optimization/41212] [4.5 Regression] miscompilation at -O2

2009-09-03 Thread jpr at csc dot fi
--- Comment #4 from jpr at csc dot fi 2009-09-03 07:10 --- FWIW: I had a look at the -fdump-tree-all files. All seems well (to my untrained eyes), until : D.1412_51 = y; D.1430_52 = D.1412_51 * 2.0e+0; z = D.1430_52; in m.f90.060t.phiprop is transformed to : D.1412_51 = 1.0e+0

[Bug tree-optimization/41212] [4.5 Regression] miscompilation at -O2

2009-09-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-01 17:31 --- Per comment #2. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED