--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-05 14:45 ---
Subject: Bug 40570
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Aug 5 14:45:15 2009
New Revision: 150487
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150487
Log:
2009-07-28 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-
--- Comment #13 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 16:43
---
Fixed.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #12 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 16:26
---
Subject: Bug 40570
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Jul 30 16:26:09 2009
New Revision: 150263
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150263
Log:
2009-07-30 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimization/4
--- Comment #11 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-29 13:40
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> That only detects direct loops, does it?
Actually, now I may understand but no, it is exactly the other way
round. The patch above only detects indirect loops, when there are at
le
--- Comment #10 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-29 10:33
---
Bootstrap and testing finished fine, I submitted the patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg01642.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40570
--- Comment #9 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-29 09:51 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > --- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 20:59
> > ---
> > So, I belive the patch below fixes this issue and I am going to
> > bootstrap it overnight. Hon
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-07-29 08:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ICE with recursion
at -O3
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 20:59
> ---
> Ha, please disr
--- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 20:59 ---
Ha, please disregard the previous message, obviously I had to make a
fool out of myself before realizing that loops in the inlining plan
are the bug, not how we handle them.
The reason there are such loops is that i
--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 20:14 ---
When I move "e->inline_failed = CIF_OK" in cgraph_mark_inline_edge()
until after call to cgraph_clone_inlined_nodes(), the endless
recursion goes away. However, I now get an assert in
cgraph_estimate_size_after_inli
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40570
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 01:59
---
Confirmed. Reduced testcase that goes into infinite loop:
=
static int foo(int i);
static int bar(int i) { foo(i); }
static int foo(int i)
{
int j;
if (j)
FOO(j);
11 matches
Mail list logo
