[Bug tree-optimization/40157] ICE with -floop-block

2009-10-15 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-15 16:27 --- I do not intend to backport all the changes from graphite GCC4.5 to GCC4.4. This testcase is now part of the graphite testsuite and works with -floop-block in the graphite branch. Sebastian -- spop at gcc dot gnu d

[Bug tree-optimization/40157] ICE with -floop-block

2009-05-16 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
--- Comment #3 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2009-05-16 12:48 --- a patch would be appreciated, even if it's not applied directly in the 4.4 branch. Matthias -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40157

[Bug tree-optimization/40157] ICE with -floop-block

2009-05-15 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 17:49 --- This problem is fixed in the Graphite branch. I guess that the problem comes from the fact that in GCC4.4 we did not handled INDIRECT_REF in expand_scalar_variables_expr. Should I back-port that code? Thanks, Sebas

[Bug tree-optimization/40157] ICE with -floop-block

2009-05-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 11:05 --- Not a regression, -floop-block is new. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --