--- Comment #14 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-05 00:32
---
My combined patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00250.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|39302 |
OtherBugsDependingO||39363
--- Comment #13 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-20 23:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=17155)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17155&action=view)
Throttle PRE, hookize SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES
This is the patch I have in my local tree (bootstrapped&tested on
--- Comment #12 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 11:36
---
(In reply to comment #11)
P.S.:
Another feature that we could look at is the number of times an input
ssa name is used. If it is used more than once, we cannot rely on the
original ssa name to go away, and hence t
--- Comment #11 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 22:06
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> You would completely underestimate the optimization opportunities PRE
> unleashes.
Well, at least for partial-partial-RE, as mentioned before in PR38401,
benchmarks indicate that we'd
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-01-14 20:51 ---
Subject: Re: huge performance regression on
EEMBC bitmnp01
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> I think the disregard for conditional execution opportunities and the
> assumption that phi nodes
--- Comment #9 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 18:47 ---
I think the disregard for conditional execution opportunities and the
assumption that phi nodes have no execution cost are two separate issues.
I'd like to address the latter first, because it causes exponential code
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 10:54 ---
Re comment #7
Those patches are just proof-of-concept, and wouldn't actually help without
additional changes in tree-ssa-pre.c. If you want, I can make the patches
apply and work properly, and send them to you to pl
--- Comment #7 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2009-01-14 10:08 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Joern, re. comment #4, Richi refers to my patch to enable PRE at -Os, see
> [1].
> An extension to this patch that we tested on x86 machines, is to disable PRE
> for scalar integer register
--- Comment #6 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 16:10 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Joern, re. comment #4, Richi refers to my patch to enable PRE at -Os, see
> [1].
> An extension to this patch that we tested on x86 machines, is to disable PRE
> for scalar integer regist
--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 20:55 ---
Joern, re. comment #4, Richi refers to my patch to enable PRE at -Os, see [1].
An extension to this patch that we tested on x86 machines, is to disable PRE
for scalar integer registers, via SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES. I
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 17:59 ---
It's indeed partial-PRE that performs these insertions. Steven has some
patches
to tune down regular insertion that may also apply to partial insertion.
See also PR38401.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org chang
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 17:34 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Testcase?
Ok, I now have a testcase that is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike
fbital. About the only characteristic it shares with fbital is that it has
a loop which provides opportu
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 16:39 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Testcase?
Unfortunately, the EEMBC benchmarks are not freely redistributable.
See http://www.eembc.org .
I'm not sure yet which parts of the benchmark are intrinsic to the problem
and whi
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 15:55 ---
Testcase?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785
15 matches
Mail list logo
