[Bug tree-optimization/38458] copy-propagation doesn't handle cycles

2009-03-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 12:55 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/38458] copy-propagation doesn't handle cycles

2009-03-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 12:54 --- Subject: Bug 38458 Author: rguenth Date: Sat Mar 28 12:54:14 2009 New Revision: 145185 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145185 Log: 2009-03-28 Richard Guenther PR tree-optimization/

[Bug tree-optimization/38458] copy-propagation doesn't handle cycles

2008-12-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 17:53 --- Subject: Bug 38458 Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 10 17:51:52 2008 New Revision: 142654 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142654 Log: 2008-12-10 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug tree-optimization/38458] copy-propagation doesn't handle cycles

2008-12-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:45 --- Thanks. Mine then. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Assigne

[Bug tree-optimization/38458] copy-propagation doesn't handle cycles

2008-12-09 Thread dnovillo at google dot com
--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at google dot com 2008-12-09 20:22 --- Subject: Re: New: copy-propagation doesn't handle cycles On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 14:53, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >{ > - phi_val.value = arg; > + phi_val.