--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 10:02 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 10:02 ---
Subject: Bug 37795
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat Mar 28 10:01:56 2009
New Revision: 145170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145170
Log:
2009-03-28 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-10-12 20:51 ---
Subject: Re: if-combine doesn't optimize !=
after >= test
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, pinskia at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-12 20:47 ---
> Subject: Re: if-combine doe
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-12 20:47 ---
Subject: Re: if-combine doesn't optimize != after >= test
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 1:40 PM, rguenther at suse dot de
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. ifcombine only combines on the CFG, in PR28685 we are dealing
> with a
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 1:40 PM, rguenther at suse dot de
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. ifcombine only combines on the CFG, in PR28685 we are dealing
> with a CFG-less opportunity.
Well it depends really. As on some targets it has a CFG based ||/&&
depending on BRANCH_COST.
Thanks,
Andrew Pi
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-10-12 20:40 ---
Subject: Re: if-combine doesn't optimize !=
after >= test
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> Does this patch also solve PR 28685?
No. ifcombine only combines on the CFG, in PR28685 we are dealing
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-10-12 20:19 ---
Does this patch also solve PR 28685?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37795
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-12 18:51 ---
Queued for 4.5.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-10 10:07 ---
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned