--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #21 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 07:56 ---
Lothar, see #10
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
--- Comment #20 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-31 02:01 ---
With all the supplied test cases and data, why is it so hard to move the bug
out of the UNCONFIRMED state. It should be fairly easy to confirm that it is a
problem by running the attached test.
--
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #19 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-28 18:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=15973)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15973&action=view)
oprofile logs
I compiled optimized executables with and without -fno-strict-aliasing and
generated an oprofile l
--- Comment #18 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-24 22:18 ---
Putting the regression marker back. The code doesn't matter; if it's a
regression, then it's regression.
--
drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
