--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-02 08:56 ---
It's working again, and a check with/without the patch produces exactly the
same code. So I guess the tester absorbed some HEP.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-01 11:39 ---
Reverting my patch on the tester fixes it. It's now back in and if it again
miscompares tomorrow I'll investigate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36401
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-31 13:56 ---
Two likely changes:
+2008-05-30 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * builtins.c (build_string_literal): Avoid generating
+ a non-gimple_val result.
+2008-05-30 Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTE
