[Bug tree-optimization/36389] [tuples] gimplify_cond_expr should be smarter

2008-08-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-11 02:13 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/36389] [tuples] gimplify_cond_expr should be smarter

2008-06-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-02 18:20 --- Subject: Bug 36389 Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 2 18:19:29 2008 New Revision: 136287 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136287 Log: PR tree-optimization/36389 * gimplify.c (gimplify

[Bug tree-optimization/36389] [tuples] gimplify_cond_expr should be smarter

2008-05-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-30 16:17 --- Created an attachment (id=15706) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15706&action=view) tuples-pr36389.patch Updated patch to optimize even when one of the branches is NULL. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/36389] [tuples] gimplify_cond_expr should be smarter

2008-05-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-30 15:56 --- Created an attachment (id=15705) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15705&action=view) tuples-pr36389.patch Very lightly tested patch (basically, make check-target-libgomp still passes, nothing regres