[Bug tree-optimization/36127] bad choice of loop IVs above -Os on x86

2023-06-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > So what seems to be happening is PRE is pull out the following from the loop: > > pretmp_250 = MEM[(float *)_2 + 4294933760B + ivtmp.159_57 * 1]; > _22 = (v

[Bug tree-optimization/36127] bad choice of loop IVs above -Os on x86

2023-06-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- So what seems to be happening is PRE is pull out the following from the loop: pretmp_250 = MEM[(float *)_2 + 4294933760B + ivtmp.159_57 * 1]; _22 = (void *) ivtmp.140_79; pretmp_253 = MEM[(float *)_22

[Bug tree-optimization/36127] bad choice of loop IVs above -Os on x86

2009-08-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-07 08:32 --- Err, that's not exactly a fix for -O2/-O3 ;) -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/36127] bad choice of loop IVs above -Os on x86

2009-08-06 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-07 04:40 --- Fixed. -- spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/36127] bad choice of loop IVs above -Os on x86

2009-08-06 Thread astrange at ithinksw dot com
--- Comment #5 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2009-08-07 03:04 --- Fixed with -O3 -fgraphite-identity. Why did I even bother checking that? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127

[Bug tree-optimization/36127] bad choice of loop IVs above -Os on x86

2008-05-07 Thread astrange at ithinksw dot com
--- Comment #4 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2008-05-07 17:36 --- Created an attachment (id=15592) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15592&action=view) minimal source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127

[Bug tree-optimization/36127] bad choice of loop IVs above -Os on x86

2008-05-04 Thread astrange at ithinksw dot com
--- Comment #3 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2008-05-05 02:13 --- Created an attachment (id=15580) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15580&action=view) and at -Os -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127

[Bug tree-optimization/36127] bad choice of loop IVs above -Os on x86

2008-05-04 Thread astrange at ithinksw dot com
--- Comment #2 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2008-05-05 02:12 --- Created an attachment (id=15579) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15579&action=view) compiled at -O3 on darwin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127

[Bug tree-optimization/36127] bad choice of loop IVs above -Os on x86

2008-05-04 Thread astrange at ithinksw dot com
-- astrange at ithinksw dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127

[Bug tree-optimization/36127] bad choice of loop IVs above -Os on x86

2008-05-04 Thread astrange at ithinksw dot com
--- Comment #1 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2008-05-05 02:12 --- Created an attachment (id=15578) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15578&action=view) source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36127