[Bug tree-optimization/34649] redundant if expression in find_conditional_asserts

2008-01-05 Thread zhouyi04 at ios dot cn
--- Comment #5 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2008-01-05 11:15 --- from svn update, it is fixed. make bootstrap OK -- zhouyi04 at ios dot cn changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/34649] redundant if expression in find_conditional_asserts

2008-01-05 Thread zhouyi04 at ios dot cn
--- Comment #4 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2008-01-05 09:54 --- Subject: Re: redundant if expression in find_conditional_asserts Thanks, I think I am now able to follow http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#testing Sincerely yours Zhouyi Zhou -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug tree-optimization/34649] redundant if expression in find_conditional_asserts

2008-01-05 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-05 09:32 --- The patch was committed to SVN. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Sta

[Bug tree-optimization/34649] redundant if expression in find_conditional_asserts

2008-01-03 Thread zhouyi04 at ios dot cn
--- Comment #2 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2008-01-04 06:31 --- Subject: Re: redundant if expression in find_conditional_asserts Hey ubizjak! Please provide a regression test for me, it is the first time I have a chance to patch gcc, Thanks a lot :) Patch against gcc-4.3.0 --- gc

[Bug tree-optimization/34649] redundant if expression in find_conditional_asserts

2008-01-03 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-03 16:10 --- (In reply to comment #0) > /*gcc/tree-vrp.c */ > > 3603 static bool > 3604 find_conditional_asserts (basic_block bb, tree last) > 3605 { > ... >if (e->dest == bb) > 3623 continue; > ... > 3652