[Bug tree-optimization/33158] missed store sinking opportunity

2023-05-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33158 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/33158] missed store sinking opportunity

2012-02-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33158 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||10050 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/33158] missed store sinking opportunity

2007-08-24 Thread paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2007-08-24 14:53 --- Subject: Re: missed store sinking opportunity Danny said he knows how to fix it (I guess in store sinking though he didn't say). From knowing him, there might be additional less obvious cases that thi

[Bug tree-optimization/33158] missed store sinking opportunity

2007-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-24 12:44 --- It also naturally would fit in the phiopt framework given the structure of virtual operands: # SMT.4_26 = VDEF *D.2016_7 = D.2019_13; if (D.2019_13 == 3) goto ; else goto ; : goto ; : # SMT.4_

[Bug tree-optimization/33158] missed store sinking opportunity

2007-08-23 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
-- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|33159 | Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0