--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.4 |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32723
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-16 17:29
---
This will not be fixed on the 4.2 branch. Closing as fixed in 4.3.0.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #17 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-31 14:22
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] memory hog in solve_graph
On 31 Oct 2007 13:07:57 -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-31 13:07
---
The memory is temporarily needed now by solve_graph(), because the graph has
48902 nodes. On the mainline we have only 3 constraints while for 4.2 we have
thousands:
ANYTHING = &ANYTHING
READONLY = &ANYTHING
INTE
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 19:21
---
Change target milestone to 4.2.3, as 4.2.2 has been released.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 00:58
---
Do we have any way to work out whether this is still a problem? Richard seems
to think the bug has been fixed, but Pascal is still seeing the problem,
apparently.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #12 from pixel at mandriva dot com 2007-08-21 13:29 ---
i do know it works nicely with gcc 4.3
but i still get the "memory hog" behaviour using branches/gcc-4_2-branch, ie:
% /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mandriva-linux-gnu/4.2.1/cc1 -O2 fail.c
runs with memory RSS raising up to 1G ma
--- Comment #11 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 01:56
---
Uh, it doesn't take 1 gig on either 4.2 or 4.3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32723
--- Comment #10 from pixel at mandriva dot com 2007-08-11 17:08 ---
are you sure it fixes it? it still takes 1G here...
--
pixel at mandriva dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 07:31 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 07:30 ---
Subject: Bug 32723
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 24 07:30:47 2007
New Revision: 126867
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126867
Log:
2007-07-24 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #7 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 07:16 ---
Didn't you commit the shared bitmap fix?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32723
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.1 |4.2.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32723
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 09:28 ---
Backporting the shared bitmap changes brings us back to 76MB max. memory usage
for 4.2. I'll bootstrap & test this.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Ad
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 09:12 ---
/tmp> ~/bin/maxmem2.sh gcc-4.1 -S -O2 -o /dev/null fail.c
total: 96228 kB
/tmp> ~/bin/maxmem2.sh gcc-4.2 -S -O2 -o /dev/null fail.c
total: 1579668 kB
trunk:
/tmp> ~/bin/maxmem2.sh /space/rguenther/tramp3d/install/
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32723
--- Comment #4 from pixel at mandriva dot com 2007-07-11 10:23 ---
i forgot to say it doesn't occur without -O, and occurs with -O, -O2
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-mandriva-linux-gnu/4.2.1/cc1 -O fail.c
_create
Analyzing compilation unitPerforming interprocedural optimizations
Assembling functio
--- Comment #3 from pixel at mandriva dot com 2007-07-10 22:21 ---
tested with rc1 and svn
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32723
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-10 20:22 ---
What exact version of 4.2.1 are you using?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32723
--- Comment #1 from pixel at mandriva dot com 2007-07-10 18:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=13882)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13882&action=view)
memory hog test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32723
21 matches
Mail list logo
