--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-29 23:22 ---
I am wrong since this is a loop linear issue:
Won't transform loop. Optimal transform is the identity transform
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-28 07:58 ---
I think the problem now is related to data-ref and I think this might get fixed
after I fix PR 32075.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-29 20:31 ---
Subject: Re: Doesn't optimize the following (obvious) sequence
On 29 Apr 2007 15:21:40 -, spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-0
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-29 16:21 ---
Subject: Re: Doesn't optimize the following (obvious) sequence
> PRE optimized the "offset" and "stride" variables.
> SCEV doesn't know how to create an offset or step out of these optimized
> operations.
I remember
--- Comment #1 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-29 16:05 ---
PRE optimized the "offset" and "stride" variables.
SCEV doesn't know how to create an offset or step out of these optimized
operations. We used to at some point, but I believe these are "peeled_chrec's"
that we remo
