--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 01:22
---
Mark this as a dup of bug 28624.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28624 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 01:22
---
Reopening for a second to ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-11 23:15
---
As far as I can see, we are miscompiling the compiler as the stage1's cc1 works
for this testcase but stage3's cc1 does not.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30126
--- Comment #12 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-11 22:16 ---
> But I think it just makes the bug latent again.
maybe. But I can compile again so I will close this.
-benjamin
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-11 21:06
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Diego I HEART YOU
>
> r119746
But I think it just makes the bug latent again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30126
--- Comment #10 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-11 21:02 ---
Diego I HEART YOU
r119746
fixes it.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30126
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-11 18:00 ---
still reducing it, I have it down to 8521 lines.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30126
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30126
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-10 01:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE
genautomata.c:6060
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 01:19 +, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
>
> --- Comment #6 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-12-10 01:19 ---
> >>Fail
--- Comment #6 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-12-10 01:19 ---
>>Fail in make bootstrap on FC6.
>>Starting on r119634 through at least r119668.
The TER patch pinskia mentions didn't go in until revision 119657 If my notes
are correct (they could be wrong)... so that couldn't cause
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 23:47 ---
The only patch in that revision frame that could have cause this (as the others
are all target specific patches):
+2006-12-08 Andrew MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * Makefile.in: Add new file tree-ssa-ter.c.
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 03:36 ---
This problem is weird. It is also hard to reduce.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30126
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 23:28 ---
Reducing ...
I think slightly different glibc headers are causing you to see this issue.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 23:20 ---
What is interesting is that I don't get a segfault during my bootstrap but I do
with your preprocessed source.
#0 remove_phi_node (phi=0xb6f8fd20, prev=0x0) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-fsf/local/gcc/gcc/tree-phinodes.c
14 matches
Mail list logo
