--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-22 20:10 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > With the introduction of the new loop unroller in 4.0,
> I think you mean 3.4.0 because the new unroller was in 3.4.0.
>
You're right, it was introduced then. Although the old loop unr
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-22 19:49 ---
> With the introduction of the new loop unroller in 4.0,
I think you mean 3.4.0 because the new unroller was in 3.4.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29946
